Procedural Aspect of the Customs Laws in the Philippines


Photo Credit: Rosette Adel through Phil. Star.


What agency has the power to collect customs duties in the Philippines?


          The Bureau of Customs (BOC), which is under the control and supervision of the Department of Finance (DOF).



What are Customs Districts?



          For administrative purposes, the Philippines is divided into divisions that are called “customs districts.” Each Customs District is supervised by one District Collector, assisted by as many Deputy District Collectors as necessary. (Sec. 206/CMTA)

All ports of entry are under the supervision and control of a Customs District. District Collectors are assigned to the principal ports of entry while Deputy District Collectors are assigned to other ports of entry. (Sec. 207)



What are the functions of a District Collector?


          The District Collector has the following functions and duties:

(1) Ensure entry of all imported goods at the customs office;

(2) Prevent importation and exportation of prohibited goods;

(3) Ensure legal compliance of regulated goods and facilitate the flow of legitimate trade;

(4) Examine, classify and value imported goods;

(5) Assess and collect duties, taxes and other charges on imported goods;

(6) Hold and dispose imported goods in accordance with this Act;

(7) Prevent smuggling and other customs fraud; and

(8) Perform other necessary duties that may be assigned by the Commissioner for the effective implementation of this Act. Subject to the supervision and control of the District Collector, the duties and functions of the District Collector may be delegated to the Deputy District Collector. The Deputy District Collector assigned to a sub-port shall be under the supervision and control of the District Collector of the corresponding principal port. (Sec. 210)


If the ruling of the District Collector as regards the assessment of customs duties appears to be erroneous, what is the remedy of the importer?


          The importer must file a written protest with the Commissioner of Customs within 15 days from the time the payment was made setting forth the objection to the ruling or decision in question and the reasons therefore. (Sec. 1106)

          Protest is the exclusive remedy in this case, without which, the action of the District Collector shall be final and conclusive. (Sec. 1107)


If the importer is in a hurry or if he wants to prevent unexpected but unavoidable delays, what is his remedy?

          The importer may file a written application for advance ruling. (Secs. 1100-05) Under the CMTA, an application for advance ruling may be lodged with the Tariff Commission (TC) if it involves tariff classification of goods. The application may also be filed with the BOC for goods valuation or origin concerns. (Sarmiento-Sy, “Advance rulings from the Bureau of Customs and the Tariff Commission” available here.)



What are the types of “Advance Ruling”?

1.      Classification Ruling if the application involves the proper tariff classification of the product. (Sec. 1100)

2.      Valuation Ruling if the application involves the proper application of a specific method on customs valuation of specific good (Sec. 1101).

3.      Ruling on Rules of Origin if the application involves the question of whether the goods qualify as originating from a certain country under the rules of origin of the applicable preferential trade agreement. (Sec. 1102)


What are the conditions for the proper filing of an application for “Advance Ruling”?

An application for an advance ruling shall cover only one (1) product or item. The application for advance ruling shall be filed at least ninety (90) days before the importation or exportation of the product or item, as the case may be. (Sec. 1103)

Note: Remember when importation begins.


If the decision of the Tariff Commission or the Commissioner of Customs is adverse to the importer, what is the remedy of the taxpayer?

          They must file an appeal with the Court of Tax Appeals. (Sec. 1104)


What if the decision is adverse to the government? What will be the next step?

          The decision shall be subject to automatic review by the Secretary of Finance. (Sec. 1104)


To effectively implement its functions, what are the remedies available to the Bureau of Customs?

1.      Exercise of Police Authority (Search, Seizure & Arrest)
2.      Forfeiture
3.      Alert Orders
4.      Compromise
5.      Distraint & Levy
6.      Constructive Distraint
7.      Civil and Criminal Actions
8.      Disposition of Goods in Customs Custody


Who are the officers authorized to effect search, seizure and arrest?

(a) Officials of the Bureau, District Collectors, Deputy District Collectors, police officers, agents, inspectors and guards of the Bureau;

(b) Upon authorization of the Commissioner, officers and members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and national law enforcement agencies; and

(c) Officials of the BIR on all cases falling within the regular performance of their duties, when payment of internal revenue taxes is involved. (Sec. 214)


Before the officers may enter a property, do they need to secure search warrants?

          The officers should secure a search warrant from a judge of competent court only if the property to be entered into is a dwelling house. (Sec. 220) In all other cases, a search warrant is not required.

When a security personnel or any other employee lives in the warehouse, store, or any building, structure or enclosure that is used for storage of goods, the property shall not be considered as a dwelling house. (Sec. 219)


What does the search of vessels, aircrafts and other vehicles include?

          The search of vessels and aircrafts includes removal of any false bottom, partition, bulkhead, or any other obstruction for the purpose of uncovering any concealed dutiable or forfeitable goods. (Sec. 221)

          Meanwhile, in the search of vehicles, the officer is authorized to open and examine any box, trunk, envelope, or other container for purposes of determining the presence of dutiable or prohibited goods. (Sec. 222)

          
          For more information regarding the lawful/permissible searches and seizures in the Philippines, you may read this blog article.


What are the properties subject to seizure and forfeiture?

(a) Any vehicle, vessel or aircraft, including cargo, which shall be used unlawfully in the importation or exportation of goods or in conveying or transporting smuggled goods in commercial quantities into or from any Philippine port or place. The mere carrying or holding on board of smuggled goods in commercial quantities shall subject such vehicle, vessel, aircraft, or any other craft to forfeiture: Provided, That the vehicle, vessel, aircraft or any other craft is not used as a common carrier which has been chartered or leased for purposes of conveying or transporting persons or cargo;

(b) Any vessel engaging in the coastwise trade which shaft have on board goods of foreign growth, produce, or manufacture in excess of the amount necessary for sea stores, without such goods having been properly entered or legally imported;

(c) Any vessel or aircraft into which shall be transferred cargo unloaded contrary to law prior to the arrival of the importing vessel or aircraft at the port of destination;

(d) Any part of the cargo, stores, or supplies of a vessel or aircraft arriving from a foreign port which is unloaded before arrival at the vessel’s or aircraft’s port of destination and without authority from the customs officer; but such cargo, ship, or aircraft stores and supplies shall not be forfeited if such unloading was due to accident, stress of weather, or other necessity and is subsequently approved by the District Collector;

(e) Goods which are fraudulently concealed in or removed contrary to law from any public or private warehouse, container yard, or container freight station under customs supervision;

(f) Goods, the importation or exportation of which are effected or attempted contrary to law, or any goods of prohibited importation or exportation, and all other goods which, in the opinion of the District Collector, have been used, are or were entered to be used as instruments in the importation or the exportation of the former;

(g) Unmanifested goods found on any vessel or aircraft if manifest therefor is required;

(h) Sea stores or aircraft stores adjudged by the District Collector to be excessive, when the duties and taxes assessed by the District Collector thereon are not paid or secured forthwith upon assessment of the same;

(i) Any package of imported goods which is found upon examination to contain goods not specified in the invoice or goods declaration including all other packages purportedly containing imported goods similar to those declared in the invoice or goods declaration to be the contents of the misdeclared package;

(j) Boxes, cases, trunks, envelopes, and other containers of whatever character used as receptacle or as device to conceal goods which are subject to forfeiture under this Act or which are so designed as to conceal the character of such goods;

(k) Any conveyance actually used for the transport of goods subject to forfeiture under this Act, with its equipage or trappings, and any vehicle similarly used, together with its equipment and appurtenances. The mere conveyance of smuggled goods by such transport vehicle shall be sufficient cause for the outright seizure and confiscation of such transport vehicle but the forfeiture shall not be effected if it is established that the owner of the means of conveyance used as aforesaid, is engaged as common carrier and not chartered or leased, or that the agent in charge thereof at the time, has no knowledge of the unlawful act; and

(l) Goods sought to be imported or exported:

(1) Without going through a customs office, whether the act was consummated, frustrated, or attempted;

(2) Found in the baggage of a person arriving from abroad and undeclared by such person;

(3) Through a false declaration or affidavit executed by the owner, importer, exporter, or consignee concerning the importation of such goods;

(4) On the strength of a false invoice or other document executed by the owner, importer, exporter, or consignee concerning the importation or exportation of such goods; or

(5) Through any other practice or device contrary to law by means of which such goods entered through a customs office to the prejudice of the government.

~ Sec. 1113


What are the properties not subject to seizure and forfeiture?

The forfeiture of the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft shall not be effected if it is established that the owner thereof or the agent in charge of the meads of conveyance used as aforesaid has no knowledge of or participation in the unlawful act: Provided, That a prima facie presumption shall exist against the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft under any of the following circumstances:

(a) If the conveyance has been used for smuggling before;

(b) If the owner is not in the business for which the conveyance is generally used; and

(c) If the owner is not financially in a position to own such conveyance.



~Sec. 1114.



What is the remedy of the aggrieved party in cases of seizure and forfeiture?

          The aggrieved party may file a written notice of appeal with the District Collector who shall then transmit the records to the Commissioner who has 30 days to decide the controversy. Upon the lapse of the said period without any decision whatsoever, the decision of the District Collector shall be deemed affirmed. (Sec. 1126)


What is the prescriptive period for the filing of the appeal?

          Counted from the day the decision was received, the taxpayer normally has 15 days within which to file the said notice of appeal. However, if the goods are perishable, they only have 5 days to do so.


What are Alert Orders?

Alert orders are written orders issued by customs officers as authorized by the Commissioner on the basis of derogatory information regarding possible noncompliance with the CMTA.

An alert order will result in the suspension of the processing of the goods declaration and the conduct of physical or nonintrusive inspection of the goods within forty-eight (48) hours from issuance of the order.

Within forty-eight (48) hours or, in the case of perishable goods, within twenty-four (24) hours from inspection, the alerting officer shall recommend the continuance of processing of goods in case of a negative finding, or issuance of a warrant of seizure and detention if a discrepancy between the declaration and actual goods is found. (More: Secs. 1111-12)


Does the Commissioner of Customs have the power to compromise?

          Yes, the Commissioner may compromise any administrative case arising under CMTA, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Finance. Cases involving forfeiture proceedings shall however not be subject to compromise. (Sec. 1131)


What remedies are available to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) that are also available to the Bureau of Customs?

          The BOC has the following remedies similar to that of the BIR’s:

1.      Distraint of Personal Properties
2.      Levy of Real Properties
3.      Constructive Distraint
4.      Civil & Criminal Actions (See more: Secs. 1132-38)


What is the available remedy to the Bureau of Customs when certain goods remain in its custody?

          The Bureau of Customs may dispose these goods. (See Sec. 1139 for the full list of goods that may be disposed) Prohibited goods shall however be destroyed. (Sec. 1146)


What are the modes of disposition?

          The goods subject to disposition may be donated to another government agency or declared for official use of the Bureau, after approval of the Secretary of Finance, or sold at a public auction. (Sec. 1141)

Comments

  1. Assignments:

    1. Risty Londonio --- Before a protest may be filed, is payment of customs duties required?
    2. Dominic Madrid --- Is automatic review available to the government if the decision of the District Collector and/or Commissioner on Customs is adverse to the government? If yes, where will the records be transmitted to?
    3. Gabriel Naparato --- What could be the reason/s why a search warrant is not required in searches of premises other than dwelling houses?
    4. Paul Jerzy Rabe --- In case of erroneous assessment of customs duties and other taxes, what are the remedies of an importer?
    5. Vicky Joy Bernal --- What are the differences between Refund and Duty Drawback?
    6. Haerim-Mai-Lin Bolanos --- What is Abatement? When is it available?
    7. Shamille Gigantone --- What are the differences between Abatement and Abandonment?
    8. Evelyn Lumbis --- What is Abandonment? What will happen in such case?
    9. Cielo Marcaida --- What is the nature of Forfeiture proceedings? Will it prosper in case the criminal action for "smuggling" is dismissed? Why or why not?
    10. Ina Samantha Miraflor --- The remedies of Distraint, Levy, Constructive Distraint, and Judicial Proceedings are available to the Bureau of Customs as they are available to the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Are there significant differences between the BOC and the BIR counterparts?
    11. Jonalyn Mirafuentes --- Are all decisions by the Commissioner on Customs appealable to the Court of Tax Appeals? If no, in what instances are they appealable to someone else?
    12. Charmen Mae Miranda --- Valuation Ruling is a type of advance ruling that pertains to valuation of goods. What could be the basis/es for the valuation of the goods subject to the Valuation Ruling?
    13. Ma. Nexevikki Morota --- Are goods imported by the government subject to customs duties? If yes, are there any exceptions?
    14. Sheina Marie Onrubia --- What are the taxes and charges that an importer must pay in connection with their acts of importation?
    15. Julie Ann Purisima --- What are the differences between Abatement and Refund?
    16. Danica Yap --- What are the differences between Classification Ruling and Valuation Ruling?

    All comments must include the entire question before the answer/s are stated. All questions and answers in this assignment are included in the term exams.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What are the taxes and charges that an importer must pay in connection with their acts of importation?

      Imported goods are subject to tariffs, but this amount will differ based on the source of the imported goods. For revenue taxes, imported goods are subjected to an additional 12% value-added tax (VAT). The VAT will be based on the total value to be determined by the BOC.

      The Philippines follows the United Nation’s Standard International Trade Classification (SITC). Import tariffs can range from 0 to 65 percent. Imported goods in sectors which have high domestic production typically incur higher tariffs. For non-agricultural goods, tariffs average at 6.7 percent.

      The Philippines’ customs levy no tariff or tax for goods worth less than P10,000 (US$200).

      Importers must pay the following specific taxes and charges in connection with their acts of importation:

      a) Import Processing Fee (IPF)

      b) Container Security Fee (CSF)

      c) Customs Documentary Stamps (CDS)

      d) Other fines, surcharges and charges

      The above mentioned taxes and charges should be paid in cash through debit from the importer’s nominated account/s in an authorized agent bank.

      On the other hand, the following are made through non-cash payment:

      Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) or Tax Debit Memo (TDM)

      AABs shall not accept TCCs or TDMs as payment for customs
      duties and taxes.

      b) Deferred Payment Government Account (DPGA)

      Procedures for the non-cash payments through TCCs, TDMs
      or DPGA shall be governed by separate regulations to be issued by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Customs (BOC).

      References:

      1. Entry Lodgment and Cargo Clearance Process of the Bureau of Customs. https://philsocietycustomsbrokers.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/entry-lodgement-and-cargo-clearance-process.pdf

      2. #AskTheTaxWhiz: Taxes for importers. https://www.rappler.com/business/214660-ask-the-tax-whiz-taxes-for-importers

      3. Import and Export Procedures in the Philippines – Best Practices. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/import-and-export-procedures-in-the-philippines-best-practices/?fbclid=IwAR323HSwTz2-aNJAtqmjnFXL9APBatKDq4ZbkscFG1N9txXLpuVHWfsBFU8#:~:text=Import%20tariffs%20can%20range%20from,production%20typically%20incur%20higher%20tariffs.&text=The%20Philippines%20Customs%20apply%20a,%2C000%20(US%24200)

      4. Republic Act 10863: An Act Modernizing The Customs and Tariff Administration. http://customs.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CMTA-RA-10863.pdf

      Delete
  2. [Part 1]
    The remedies of Distraint, Levy, Constructive Distraint, and Judicial Proceedings are available to the Bureau of Customs as they are available to the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Are there significant differences between the BOC and the BIR counterparts?

    The following are the differences I have noted between the above remedies available in the BIR and the BOC :
    Threshold to avail of distraint and levy- Sec. 205 of the NIRC states that the remedies of distraint and levy shall not be availed of where the amount of tax involved is not more than One hundred pesos (P100), while Sec. 1132 of the CMTA states that such remedies shall not be allowed when the amount of duties and taxes involved is not more than ten thousand pesos (₱10,000.00)

    Notification of Sale/Disposition- Sec. 209 of the NIRC provides that the notification of the sale shall be exhibited in not less than two (2) public places in the municipality or city where the distraint is made, one shall be at the Office of the Mayor of the city or municipality in which the property is distrained, while Sec. 1141 of the CMTA provides that the notification of the sale shall be posted at a public place at the port where the goods are located for ten (10) days and published electronically or in a newspaper of general circulation

    Time of Sale/Disposition- Sec. 209 of the NIRC provides that the sale shall be done not be less than twenty (20) days after notice to the owner or possessor of the property as above specified and the publication or posting of such notice, while Sec. 1141 of the CMTA provides that the sale or disposition shall be done within thirty (30) days from the ten (10)-day notice
    Mode of Disposition- The NIRC specified that the distrained properties shall be sold, while Sec. 1141 of the CMTA provides that goods subject to disposition may be donated to another government agency, declared for official use of the Bureau, after approval of the Secretary of Finance, or sold at a public auction

    Disposition of Proceeds- Sec. 209 of NIRC states that the expenses chargeable against the seizure and sale are the (a) tax due, (b) actual expenses of seizure and (c) preservation of the property pending the sale, while Sec. 1143 of CMTA the following are chargeable against the proceeds: (a) customs duties, except in the case of forfeited goods, (b) taxes and other charges due the government, (c) government storage charges, (d) Expenses for the appraisal, advertisement, and sale of auctioned goods (e) arrastre and private storage charges and demurrage charges, and (f) freight, lighterage or general average, on the voyage of importation, of which due notice shall have been given to the District Collector.

    Want of Bidder- Sec. 215 of NIRC provides that in case there is no bidder for real property exposed for sale as or if the highest bid is for an amount insufficient to pay the taxes, penalties and costs, the Internal Revenue Officer conducting the sale shall declare the property forfeited to the Government, while Sec. 1149 of CMTA states that goods which remain unsold after at least two (2) public biddings either due to the lack of bidders or for the lack of an acceptable bid, may be donated to another government agency or declared for official use of the Bureau. If the goods are not suitable either for official use or donation, these may be subject to reexport as government property or sold through a negotiated sale.

    ReplyDelete
  3. [Part 2]
    Period for filling a protest- Sec. 228 of the NIRC of the NIRC sets the period to protest an assessment within thirty (30) days from receipt of the assessment, while Se. 1106 of the CMTA sets the period to protest the ruling of the Commissioner within fifteen (15) days from the ruling of the Commissioner.

    Period to render decision for protest- Sec. 228 of the NIRC provides that a protest should be decided within one hundred eighty (180) days from submission of the documents, while Sec. 1110 of CMTA states that a decision should be rendered within thirty (30) days from receipt of the protest.

    Automatic Review in Forfeiture Cases- The NIRC does not provide for automatic review when the decision is adverse to the government, while Sec. 1127 of the CMTA provides for automatic review of the decision of the District Collector when it is adverse to the government

    ReplyDelete
  4. Abatement is the reduction or dimunition, in whole or in part, of duties and taxes in goods which have not yet been released for consumption or have been placed under another customs procedure. On the other hand, refund is the return, in whole or in part, of duties and taxes established to have been overcharged as a result of an error in the assessment or goods declaration. In abatement, payment has not been made, while in refund, the goods are already paid.

    Sources:
    R.A. No. 10863, Sec. 102, 903, and 904.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Answer of Ms Morota

    Are goods imported by the government subject to customs duties? If yes, are there any exceptions?

    Yes, the goods imported by the government are not exempted from customs duties. Section 104, Chapter 2 of the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (GMTA) states:

    Section 104. When Duty and Tax Are Due on Imported Goods. — except as otherwise provided for in the said Act or in other laws, all goods, when imported into the Philippines, shall be subject to duty upon importation, including goods previously exported from the Philippines.

    However, when it comes to certain imported goods, the Government is exempted in paying customs duties. Some of these exceptions are the following:

    1. Relief Consignment (Section 121, Chapter 4 of the GMTA);

    2. Applicable exemptions provided for by Section 800, Chapter 1, Title VIII of the GMTA);

    3. The exceptions granted to government agencies, instrumentalities or government-owned or -controlled corporations (GOCCs) with existing contracts, commitments, agreements, or obligations with foreign countries requiring such exemption; and

    4. Those that may be granted by the President upon prior recommendation of the NEDA in the interest of national economic development.

    Grade: 93.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What are differences between REFUND and DUTY DRAWBACK?

    ANSWER:

    The differences between Refund and Duty Drawback are as follows:

    1. As to the Meaning, REFUND refers to the return, in whole or in part, of duties and taxes paid on goods by the importer that has made an overpayment or erroneous payment or been overcharged due to wrong assessment while DUTY DRAWBACK refers to the refund or credit of duties to the importer, and may include internal revenue taxes actually paid for the importation in whole or in part.

    2. As to person that may apply, BOTH Refund and Duty drawback may be file by the importer.

    3. As to the coverage, Both Refund and Duty drawback are remedies of a taxpayer. However, An importer may file a REFUND only for: (1) duties and taxes charged exceeding the amount due; (2) when there is an error in the assessment of good declaration; (3) when BOC permits a change in customs procedure, from one where duties and taxes are paid to another where no or less duties and taxes are paid; (4) manifests clerical errors made on an invoice or entry, errors in return of weight measure and gauge; and (5) errors in the distribution of charges on invoices not involving any question of law.
    While importer may apply for DUTY DRAWBACK of up to (99%) of the duty imposed by law for: (1) all fuel imported into the Philippines used to propel sea vessel engaged in international trade; (2) sea vessel engaged in coastal trade, if the maritime industry authority or any approporiate government agency authorized it; (3) (50%) for on the duty imposed by law for petroleum oils and oils obtained from Bituminous materials, crude oil imported by non -electric utilities, sold directly or indirectly; (4) generation of electric power and manufacture of city gas; and (5) imported materials and articles used in the packing, packaging, covering putting up, marking or labelling for which duties had been paid, upon exportation of the goods manufactured or produced.

    4. Exception to the coverage, REFUND shall not be granted if the amount of duties and taxes involved is less than P 5,000.00 while DUTY DRAWBACK, a registered enterprise which has previously applied for tax credits based on customs duties paid on imported raw materials and supplies shall not be entitled to duty drawback for the same importation subsequently processed and re exported.

    5. Filing of claims for Refund and duty drawback, claims for REFUND must be made in writing and filed with the Bureau within 12 months from the date of payment of duties and taxes while DUTY DRAWBACK shall be paid or granted by the Bureau to claimants within 60 days after receipt of properly accomplished claim. Within 1 year from the date of importation and 1 year from the date of exportation a claim and application for drawback shall prescribe.

    6. Requirement before application may be granted, BOTH duty drawback and refund before may be approved, the BOC must verify that all duties and taxes subject of the claim were duly paid and remitted to the Bureau of Treasury.


    REFERENCES:
    ● Ingles, I. M. D. (2018). Tax Made Less Taxing: A Reviewer with Codals and Cases. p.642
    ●Andes, R. (2020).The Basics of Tariff and Customs Laws in the Philippines. Retrived from https://legalscribbles.blogspot.com/2020/06/thebasics-of-tariff-customs-laws-in.html?m=I
    ● customstrade.asia. (n.d). Customs Modernization and Tariff Act. Retrived from https://customstrade.asia/boc-issues-streamlined-rules-on-processing-duty-drawback-refunds/
    ● Pablo, R. (November 15, 2016). BOC issues draft rule on duty drawback,refund implementation. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.portcalls.com/BOC-issues-draft-rule-duty-drawback-refund-implementation/

    ReplyDelete
  7. #11. Are all decisions by the Commissioner on Customs appealable to the Court of Tax Appeals? If no, in what instances are they appealable to someone else?

    No. In cases not involving protest or forfeiture shall be subject for automatic review by the Secretary of Finance when:

    (1) No decision is rendered within the prescribed period or;
    (2) Any decision rendered by the Commissioner is adverse to the government.

    Section 1128, Chapter 5, Title XI of Republic Act No. 10863, AN ACT MODERNIZING THE CUSTOMS AND TARIFF ADMINISTRATION states:

    Sec. 1128. Automatic Review by the Secretary of Finance in Other Cases.
    – In cases not involving protest or forfeiture, the Commissioner shall automatically review any decision by the District Collector that is adverse to the government. The records of the case shall be elevated to the Commissioner within five (5) days from the promulgation of the decision. The Commissioner shall decide on the automatic review within thirty (30) days from receipt of the records, or within ten (10) days in the case of perishable goods. When no decision is rendered within the prescribed period or when any decision rendered by the Commissioner is adverse to the government, the records of the case under review shall be automatically elevated within five (5) days for the review of the Secretary of Finance. The decision issued by the Secretary of Finance, whether or not a decision was rendered by the Commissioner within thirty (30) days from receipt of the records, or within ten (10) days in the case of perishable goods, shall be final upon the Bureau.

    https://laws.chanrobles.com/republicacts/109_republicacts.php?id=10648

    ReplyDelete
  8. Question #1: Before a protest may be filed, is payment of customs duties required?

    Answer:

    Yes.

    Section 2308 of the Tariff and Customs Code provides that “When a ruling or decision of the Collector is made whereby liability for duties, fees, or other money charge is determined, except the fixing of fines in seizure cases, the party adversely affected may protest such ruling or decision by presenting to the Collector at the time when payment of the amount claimed to be due the Government is made, or within thirty days thereafter, a written protest setting forth his objections to the ruling or decision in question, together with the reasons therefor. No protest shall be considered unless payment of the amount due after final liquidation has first been made.

    Thus, a protest will not prosper unless the customs duties have been paid.

    Source: Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 75. We are no longer using the Tariff & Customs Code. It is already superseded by the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act.

      What is the new rule? Is it still the same?

      Delete
    2. Hi Sir. Sorry for my wrong answer. It was due to my inadvertence.

      Under the CMTA, there is a new rule with regards to payment of custom duties in relation to protest.

      Section 1106 provides that “When a ruling or decision of the District Collector or customs officer involving goods with valuation, rules of origin, and other customs issues is made, except the fixing of fines in seizure cases, the party adversely affected may appeal by way of protest against such ruling or decision by presenting to the Commissioner at the time when payment of the amount claimed to be due the government is made, or within fifteen (15) days thereafter, a written protest setting forth the objection to the ruling or decision in question and the reasons therefore.

      Subject to the approval of the Secretary of Finance, the Commissioner shall provide such rules and regulations as to the requirement for payment or nonpayment of the disputed amount and in case of nonpayment, the release of the importation under protest upon posting of sufficient security.”

      The CMTA allows the Commissioner, subject to the approval of Secretary of Finance, to issue rules and regulations with regards to the payment or non-payment of custom duties before filing a protest, as well as rules on posting security before allowing non-payment.

      However, Section 10 of the Custom Administrative Order (CAO) No. 02-2020 entitled Dispute Settlement and Protest provides that “the aggrieved importer or exporter or any stakeholder directly affected by the adverse ruling of the District Collector in all Protestable cases arising from tariff classification, valuation, rules of origin or other customs issues, may appeal by way of protest in writing to the Commissioner within 15 days from receipt of the adverse ruling of the District Collector or, when payment is made as a result of the adverse ruling, within 15 days from such payment. Otherwise the action of the District Collector shall be final and conclusive.”

      Under CAO 02-2020, payment of customs duties is no longer required before filing a protest. The aggrieved party may file a protest within the prescribed period from the receipt of the decision or from the payment of the dues as a result of the unfavorable ruling.

      Delete
  9. Abatement has a variety of meanings. Generally it means the ending, reduction or lessening of something. In the field of tax it could refer to a tax break offered by a state or municipality on certain types of real estate or business opportunities - more specifically known as property abatement. A real estate tax abatement may reduce a home's property tax for a period of time or may grant tax breaks to businesses. Its main purpose is to encourage economic development in said locality.

    It can also refer to a cancellation of tax liability. Abatement means that there will be no payment involved as it effectively cancels the liability to pay. The Commissioner on Internal Revenue is the only one who has sole authority to abate taxes, penalties or interest in tax abatement. It cannot be delegated through regulations or appointment. Abatement is only allowed when the tax or any portion thereof appears to be unjustly or excessively assessed or the administration and collection costs involved do not justify the collection of amount due. Without either of those previously mentioned, abatement cannot be done.

    Reference:
    1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/abatement.asp#:~:text=Key%20Takeaways,grant%20tax%20breaks%20to%20businesses.
    2. http://www.sgv.ph/to-compromise-or-to-abate-by-betheena-c-dizon-june-16-2014/
    3. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/tax-abatement

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 77.

      What is abatement within the purview of CMTA? When is it available?

      Delete
    2. Abatement in the CMTA refers to the reduction or diminution, in whole or in part, of duties and taxes where payment has not been made.

      It is available when goods have not yet been released for consumption or have been placed under another customs procedure, provided that no other offense or violation has been committed. There are three cases where the declarant will not be required to pay the duties and taxes nor will they be entitled to a refund.

      They are the following:
      a) When, at the request of the declarant, the goods are abandoned, or as determined by the Bureau, the goods are destroyed or rendered commercially;
      valueless while under customs control. Any cost herein incurred shall be borne
      by the declarant;
      (b) When goods are destroyed or irrecoverably lost by accident or force majeure. The remaining waste or scrap after destruction, if taken into consumption, shall be subject to the duties and taxes that would be applicable on such waste or scrap if imported in same state; and
      (c) When there are shortages due to the nature of the goods.

      There is also abatement for damage incurred during voyage, abatement of duty on missing package, abatement for deficiency in contents of packages, abatement on goods lost or destroyed, etc.

      Delete
  10. What are the differences between Classification Ruling and Valuation Ruling?

    ANSWER:
    A classification ruling is an advance ruling on the tariff classification of goods with the Commission.1 While a valuation ruling is an advance valuation ruling on customs valuation of specific goods. 2 A classification ruling applies in generality of the goods, while a valuation ruling is applied to specific goods.

    1Sec. 1100, R.A. 10863/
    2Sec, 1101, R. A. 10863

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 90.

      Which of the two pertains to the assessment of customs duties?

      Delete
  11. What is abandonment? What will happen in such case?
    Tax Remedies of the Taxpayer
    A. Administrative Remedies
    1. Protest
    2. Refund (abatement or drawback)
    3. Payment of the fine or redemption
    4. ABANDONMENT (express or implied) and
    5. Appeal to the Commissioner

    B. Judicial Remedies
    1. Appeal to CTA and
    2. Filing of criminal action against erring customs officials
    Abandonment
    The renunciation by an importer of all his interests and property rights over imported articles. (RA No. 10863, Sec. 1129).
    Kinds of Abandonment:
    1. Express Abandonment- When the owner, importer, or consignee of the imported article, expressly signifies in writing and under oath to the Collector of Customs his intention to abandon the shipment in favor of the government. (RA No. 10863, Section 1129 (a))
    2. Implied Abandonment
    a. Failure to file goods declaration
    When the owner, importer, or consignee, or interested party after due notice, fails to file the goods declaration within the prescribed period.

    Note:
    The term goods declaration shall include provisional or incomplete goods declaration deemed valid by the Bureau.

    However, in case of failure of the Commissioner to question the propriety of the Import Entry and Internal Revenue Declaration within 1 year from the date of the final payment of duties obliterates the effects of implied abandonment (Pilipinas Shell Corp. v Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 195876, December 5, 2016)


    b. Failure to pay duties and taxes
    Having filed such goods declaration:
    i. the owner, importer, consignee or interested party after due notice, fails to pay the assessed duties and taxes; or
    ii. if the regulated goods failed to comply with prior import permit requirement within 15 days from the date of final assessment.
    Note:
    If such regulated goods are subject of an Alert Order and the assessed D&T are not paid within 15 days from notification by the Bureau of the resolution of the Alert Order, the same shall also be deemed abandoned.
    c. Failure to claim the goods
    i. Having paid the assessed duties, taxes and other charges, the owner, importer, consignee or other interested party after due notice fails to claim the goods within 30 days from payment.
    ii. When the owner or importer fails to claim goods in customs bonded warehouses within the prescribed period (R.A. No. 10863, Sec. 1129 (b-e)).
    Due Notice Requirement in Abandonment
    The due notice of requirement may be provided by the Bureau through:
    a. Electronic notice; or
    b. Personal service
    For non-regular importers, notification shall be by registered mail or personal service. For this purpose, the accreditation of importers, exporters, and other third parties shall include provision for mandatory receipt of electronic notices.
    Effects of Abandonment
    1. Expressly abandoned goods shall ipso facto be deemed the property of the Government and shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of R.A. No. 10863.
    2. Impliedly abandoned goods may be reclaimed by the owner or importer of goods at any time within 30 days after the lapse of the prescribed period to file the declaration; and
    3. When the Bureau sells impliedly abandoned goods, the proceeds of the sale, after deduction of any tax shall be turned over to those persons entitled to receive them or if not possible, held at their disposal for a specified period. After the lapse of the specified period, the balance shall be transferred to the forfeiture fund (R.A. No. 10863, Sec. 1130)

    ReplyDelete
  12. One exception to the rule that no search may be made without judicial warrant is a customs search. Under the Tariff and Customs Code, searches and seizures may be made by persons exercising police authority even without a warrant for purposes of enforcing customs and tariff laws (Section 219 of RA 10863, or the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act).

    Jurisprudence laid the reasons for exempting customs searches from the requisite warrant before a search can be validly effected. The Court held that customs goods and articles are always in the course of transportation and concealed in movable vessels. They can easily be moved or shipped from one place to another, hence they can readily be put out of reach of a search warrant. In a search of a ship or contraband goods in warehouses, it is not practicable to secure a warrant because the ship or the goods can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction where such warrant was sought or issued. (Papa v. Mago, G.R. No. L-27360, February 28, 1968 citing Carroll v. United States, 39 A.L.R., 790, 799) The doctrine and rationale in Papa v. Mago case as adopted from the Carrol v. US case was reiterated by the Supreme Court in People v. Court of First Instance of Rizal (CFI), G.R. No. L-41686 November 17, 1980 when it set aside a decision of the trial court excluding the articles and goods seized by the customs officers for being obtained without a warrant stressing that under Section 2208 of the RA1937, or the old Customs and Tariffs Code, (now Section 219 of RA 10863), persons duly commissioned to enforce tariff and customs law may at any time enter or pass through or search any land or inclosures of any warehouse, store or other building not being a dwelling house without need of a search warrant. In Salvador v. People, the Court also ruled law enforcers who are tasked to effect the enforcement of the customs and tariff laws are authorized to search and seize, without a search warrant, any article, cargo or other movable property. It held that the Government’s policy to combat the serious malady of smuggling cannot be reduced to futility and impotence on the ground that dutiable articles on which the duty has not been paid are entitled to the same Constitutional protection as an individual’s private papers and effects (G.R. No. 146706. July 15, 2005, also cited in Dela Cruz v. People, G.R. No. 209387, January 11, 2016).

    Meanwhile, Section 220 of RA 10863 requires a judicial warrant before a dwelling house may be search in connection with the implementation of tariff and customs laws. It can be gleaned from People v. Mago case that the requirement arises from the substantial distinction between the search carried out in dwelling houses and customs searches involving contrabands, smuggled goods in warehouse, stores, as well as moving vehicles or ships. In a search of a dwelling house, judicial warrant may readily be obtained while in search of smuggled goods in warehouses, stores, and inclosures, a judicial search warrant is not practicable as the goods and articles can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought. The customs officers run the risk of losing the contrabands within their jurisdiction if they are required to secure a judicial warrant before they may validly undertake a search of premises for purposes of enforcing customs laws. The warrantless customs search being an exception founded upon practicality, search on dwelling houses cannot be made without judicial warrant it being readily obtainable. The mantle of constitutional protection on the privacy of dwelling houses remains even if the search is intended to enforce customs laws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 93.

      What can you say about non-moving structures where search warrants are not required?

      Delete
    2. Customs searches on fixed-structures such as enclosures, warehouse, store, building, or structure where articles or goods are stored and not principally used as a dwelling house are justified as follows:

      (1) The Constitution does not guaranty immunity to smugglers. Customs searches are held valid as an exception to the constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures to avoid the proliferation of the practice of introducing contraband and illegal goods to the country to the prejudice of the government’s effort to collect sufficient revenues for its effective operation.

      (2) Customs searches on fixed structures or moving vehicles are justified as there are differences between search and seizure of stolen or forfeited goods or goods liable to duties and concealed to avoid payment thereof and search and seizure of a man’s private books and papers for the purpose of obtaining information contained therein or of using them as evidence against him as follows: (a) in the first case, the government is entitled to the possession of the property while in latter, it is not entitled to its possession; and, (b) the seizure of stolen goods is authorized by the law in case of forfeited goods or goods concealed to avoid payment of custom duties. Being authorized by law upon these grounds, they are not covered by the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. This rationale has been laid in Boyd v. United States which was cited in Carroll v. United States, 39 A.L.R., 790, 799, which was in turn adopted in Papa v. Mago, G.R. No. L-27360, February 28, 1968.

      Delete
  13. Paul Jerzy R. Rabe, JD-III of BC LawJune 16, 2020 at 5:17 AM

    Question:
    In case of erroneous assessment of customs duties and other taxes, what are the remedies of an importer?

    Answer:
    (Part 1)
    Remedies of a taxpayer (specifically an importer) is a very broad topic. Section 28 and 29, Chapter III, Title VIII of the National Internal Revenue Code states the general law about Protesting an Assessment and Recovery of Tax Erroneously or Illegally Collected.

    SEC. 228. Protesting of Assessment. - When the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative finds that proper taxes should be assessed, he shall first notify the taxpayer of his findings: Provided, however, That a pre-assessment notice shall not be required in the following cases:
    (a) When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in the computation of the tax as appearing on the face of the return; or
    (b) When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the amount actually remitted by the withholding agent; or
    (c) When a taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or tax credit of excess creditable withholding tax for a taxable period was determined to have carried over and automatically applied the same amount claimed against the estimated tax liabilities for the taxable quarter or quarters of the succeeding taxable year; or
    (d) When the excise tax due on excisable articles has not been paid; or
    (e) When the article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person, such as, but not limited to, vehicles, capital equipment, machineries and spare parts, has been sold, traded or transferred to non-exempt persons.
    The taxpayers shall be informed in writing of the law and the facts on which the assessment is made; otherwise, the assessment shall be void.
    Within a period to be prescribed by implementing rules and regulations, the taxpayer shall be required to respond to said notice. If the taxpayer fails to respond, the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative shall issue an assessment based on his findings.
    Such assessment may be protested administratively by filing a request for reconsideration or reinvestigation within thirty (30) days from receipt of the assessment in such form and manner as may be prescribed by implementing rules and regulations. Within sixty (60) days from filing of the protest, all relevant supporting documents shall have been submitted; otherwise, the assessment shall become final.
    If the protest is denied in whole or in part, or is not acted upon within one hundred eighty (180) days from submission of documents, the taxpayer adversely affected by the decision or inaction may appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals within thirty (30) days from receipt of the said decision, or from the lapse of one hundred eighty (180)-day period; otherwise, the decision shall become final, executory and demandable.

    SEC. 229. Recovery of Tax Erroneously or Illegally Collected. - no suit or proceeding shall be maintained in any court for the recovery of any national internal revenue tax hereafter alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or of any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority, of any sum alleged to have been excessively or in any manner wrongfully collected without authority, or of any sum alleged to have been excessively or in any manner wrongfully collected, until a claim for refund or credit has been duly filed with the Commissioner; but such suit or proceeding may be maintained, whether or not such tax, penalty, or sum has been paid under protest or duress.
    In any case, no such suit or proceeding shall be filed after the expiration of two (2) years from the date of payment of the tax or penalty regardless of any supervening cause that may arise after payment: Provided, however, That the Commissioner may, even without a written claim therefor, refund or credit any tax, where on the face of the return upon which payment was made, such payment appears clearly to have been erroneously paid.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Paul Jerzy R. Rabe, JD-III of BC LawJune 16, 2020 at 5:20 AM

    (Part 2)
    A more detailed document that discuss the remedies available to an importer is an unnumbered Customs Administrative Order (CAO) with the subject “Dispute Settlement and Protest”. This CAO prescribes the policies, guidelines and procedures on dispute settlement and protest in the Bureau of Customs (Bureau), pursuant to Sections 114, 425, 1100-1102, 1104, 1106-1110, 1126, 1128 and 1136 of Republic Act No. 10863, otherwise known as the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (CMTA).
    Section 5 and Section 6 of the said CAO discusses the Dispute Settlement and Protest related to Customs Duties. (this is quite lengthy, please refer to Reference No. 3 for the whole CAO).
    Section 5. Dispute Settlement.
    5.1. Dispute Settlement Arising from Tariff Classification Issues.
    5.1.1. Upon lodgment of goods declaration and before assessment becomes final, as when the goods are being subjected to documentary check or physical inspection, the Customs Officer may raise a question against the correctness of the tariff classification as declared and reclassify the goods. If the importer does not agree with the reclassification, a tariff classification issue arises which he may, at any time before the reassessment becomes final, elevate the matter to the District Collector for determination whether a tariff classification dispute exists.
    5.1.2. If the District Collector determines that a valid tariff classification dispute exists involving technical questions that require further testing and review, he will immediately forward the same to the Commission for resolution. Pending resolution of the tariff classification dispute by the Commission, the District Collector may, upon the request of the importer, allow the tentative release of the goods upon payment of the duties and taxes as declared in the goods declaration and posting of sufficient security to cover the disputed amount of duties and taxes and other charges and compliance with other pertinent applicable rules and regulations.
    5.1.3. However, if the District Collector adopts the findings of the Customs Officer, he shall notify the aggrieved importer of his decision in writing, the reasons thereof shall be indicated and with a directive to pay the duties and taxes in full based on the reclassification made by the Customs Officer. In such a case, the aggrieved importer may appeal the decision of the District Collector to the Commissioner by way of protest within fifteen (15) days from payment of the duties, taxes, and other charges as reassessed. When the appeal by way of protest is received by the Commissioner, the tariff classification dispute shall be referred to the Commission for resolution within fifteen (15) days from receipt thereof.
    5.1.4. The docketing of tariff classification disputes forwarded by the Bureau to the Commission shall be governed by the rules of the Commission. The Bureau, however, shall coordinate with the Commission on the docketing system to be used for all tariff classification disputes referred to the Commission as well as the decisions promulgated by the latter, for purposes of recording, inventory, accounting, monitoring, filing, and publication of these disputes and decisions.
    5.1.5. When a shipment is covered by an alert order predicated on alleged misclassification that is in dispute, the tariff classification issue shall be referred to the Commission for a ruling.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Paul Jerzy R. Rabe, JD-III of BC LawJune 16, 2020 at 5:20 AM

    (Part 3)
    5.2. Dispute Settlement Arising from Customs Valuation.
    5.2.1. Upon lodgment of goods declaration and before assessment becomes final, the Customs Officer may challenge the declaration made by the importer as to the customs value of the goods pursuant to the Section 707 of the CMTA.
    5.2.2. When there arises a customs valuation issue, the Customs Officer shall indicate the reasons thereof and a recommendation as to the correct Method of Valuation to be used and the resulting customs value to be adopted vice the customs value declared. If the importer does not agree with the findings and recommendation of the Customs Officer, the matter shall be referred to the District Collector for resolution.
    5.2.3. Pending resolution of the correct customs value, the District Collector may, upon the request of the importer, allow the tentative release of the goods upon payment of the duties and taxes as declared in the goods declaration and posting of sufficient security to cover the difference between the amount of duties and taxes as recommended by the Customs Officer and the duties and taxes computed based on the customs value declaration.
    5.2.4. The District Collector shall resolve in writing the valuation dispute within fifteen (15) days from receipt of all position papers and any evidence submitted by the parties involved.
    5.2.5. In case of an adverse decision by the District Collector, the importer shall be required to pay the additional duties and taxes as adjudged. Any posted security shall be made to answer for the deficiency in duties and taxes resulting from the decision.
    5.2.6. The Bureau shall establish a process or a system in resolving customs valuation issues which shall include the docketing of the valuation cases, the responsibility of the Customs Officer to submit a report of findings or position paper in support of his action to challenge the customs value declaration, the right of an importer to confront the issues raised and submit his position paper and any evidence to support his customs value declaration and implementation of final decisions on valuation disputes.
    5.3. Dispute Settlement Arising from Rules of Origin and Other Customs Issues.
    5.3.1. When an action or inaction by any subordinate Customs Officer on rules of origin and other customs issues is challenged, the aggrieved party may elevate the matter in writing to the District Collector who, when the nature of the issue or issues requires, shall direct the parties involved to submit their respective position papers and any evidence on the issues within five (5) days from receipt of the complaint-dispute.
    5.3.2. The District Collector shall resolve in writing the dispute within fifteen (15) days from receipt of all position papers and any evidence submitted by the parties involved.
    5.4. Dispute settlement arising from mixed issues. When the dispute involves mixed issues on declared tariff classification, valuation of goods, rules of origin or other customs issue, the issues shall, as far as practicable, be resolved by the Bureau without waiting for the resolution on tariff classification by the Commission. Otherwise, when the tariff classification is indispensable for other issue such as valuation, upon issuance of the tariff classification ruling, the District Collector concerned shall decide on the other issues in dispute in accordance with the applicable dispute settlement process.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Paul Jerzy R. Rabe, JD-III of BC LawJune 16, 2020 at 5:21 AM

    (Part 4)
    Section 6. Protest.
    6.1. The aggrieved importer or exporter or any stakeholder directly affected by the adverse decision of the District Collector in disputes arising from tariff classification in certain cases, valuation, rules of origin or other customs issues, may appeal by way of protest to the Commissioner within fifteen (15) days from receipt of the adverse decision of the District Collector or, when payment is made as a result of the adverse decision, within fifteen (15) days from such payment.
    6.2. In resolving the protest, the Commissioner shall provide the parties involved with sufficient opportunity to submit position paper and any evidence in support of their respective positions in the protest.
    6.3. The Commissioner shall resolve the protest with fifteen (15) days from receipt of all position papers and any evidence from all parties involved in the protest.



    References:
    1. National Internal Revenue Code
    2. https://www.bir.gov.ph/index.php/tax-code.html#title8
    3. http://customs.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Dispute-Settlement-and-Appellate-Remedies.pdf


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 84. Answer is too long. The question seeks only the names of the remedies. No need to state all the details of the process.

      Delete
  17. What is the nature of Forfeiture proceedings? Will it prosper in case the criminal action for "smuggling" is dismissed?

    Answer:
    The forfeiture proceeding under the tariff and customs laws is not penal in nature. It is administrative and civil in nature and is directed against the res or imported articles and entails a determination of the legality of their importation. The main purpose of which is to enforce the administrative fines or forfeiture incident to unlawful importation of goods or their deliberate possession. Yes, the forfeiture proceeding will still prosper even if the criminal action for smuggling is dismissed. Acquittal in criminal charge not res judicata in seizure or forfeiture proceedings because (1) Criminal proceedings are actions in personam while seizure or forfeiture proceedings are actions in rem; (2) Customs compromise does not extinguish criminal liability. (People vs. Desiderio, GR No. L-208005, November 26, 1965)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Answers sent through e-mail:

    1. Gigantone - 80. Answer too long. There is also abatement in the CMTA.
    2. Miranda - 85. Answer too long.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Grade for Mr. Madrid's answer --- 90.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Basics of Tariff & Customs Laws in the Philippines

Peculiar Properties Included in the Gross Estate